ARTIGO DE PESQUISA
Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in a Caatinga area, in the municipality of Crato (Ceará, Brazil)
Abstract
The objective of this study was to carry out an ethnobotanical survey of medicinal species and verify the versatility of these species. The research was carried out in the municipality of Crato, in Vila São Bento neighborhood, from semi-structured interviews seeking information on the use of medicinal plants and their therapeutic indications in the region. Versatility was achieved through relative importance. A total of 21 species were described (most of which are exotic), distributed in 16 families. From the total of species, there were 04 with great versatility regarding the use of Mentha spicata L., Chenopodium ambrosioides L., Ruta graveolens L., and Rosmarinus officinalis L. The most representative families were Lamiaceae and Rutaceae. The main parts used of the plants were leaves (42.31%), bark (30.76%), inner bark (7.69%), root, flower, and fruit (3.85% each). The most frequent forms of preparation were infusion (54.55%), lambedor (24.24%), sauce (12.12%), pulp (6.06%) and juice (3.03%). The plants are used for various health problems like flu, fever, headache, and inflammation in general. The data show that local populations hold knowledge that may be useful as a subsidy for ethnopharmacobotanical and phytochemical studies that may lead to the discovery of new herbal medicines.
- Keywords:
- Ethnobotanical research.
- Medicinal treatment.
- Phytotherapeutics.
- Traditional knowledge.
Introduction
Medicinal plants can be an important factor in the world health sector. From the beginnings of mankind, the phytotherapeutics are used and the knowledge about their use is spread among the generations. In the northeastern Caatinga, the communities have a real natural pharmacopeia, in which most of the resources used come from the local area or purchased commercially[1].
In Brazil, it is evident that the use of medicinal plant species is associated with easy access and low cost. In addition, the use of medicinal plants is favorable to human health, as long as the user has prior knowledge of its purpose, risk and benefits. For despite their natural origin, some species are toxic to the organism[2].
The rescue of knowledge related to traditional medicine is relevant to the strengthening of local culture, since knowledge is the identity of the community, besides being a tool for use as a therapeutic resource[3].
The Ethnobiology is the science studying the relationships of people with the environment with the objective of rescuing traditional knowledge, where Ethnobotany is inserted, and it is characterized as an important tool for the knowledge of the uses empirical studies of medicinal plants in traditional communities, generating information that facilitates the development of drugs, sustainable use of resources and the conservation of biota and the valorization of local knowledge and culture[4].
The Caatinga vegetation is a place where wood exploitation usually takes place. It is characterized by dry and poor environments, but its biodiversity favors some economic activities in the cosmetics, pharmaceutical, chemical, and food industries. The biome is one of the least studied in Brazil, considered as one of the most suffering from human interference. Also, it is the least protected region of the country, with only a small percentage of land included in any type of conservation area. In this way, studies that increase our understanding of plant behavior are of great importance for conservation and sustainability[5].
There is a shortage of medicinal plants studies that allow a broad view of the great diversity of species used by the population for therapeutic purposes. Much of the traditional knowledge about plants, particularly medicinal, is being lost over time, either because of lack of studies, or because of the lack of interest of the new generations, or because of the inadequate use of plant resources. Some species of plants of the Caatinga suffer irretrievable losses due to the absence of sustainable management techniques[6]. Therefore, the effort of researchers in the area of Ethnobotany to describe the use of plants of the Caatinga becomes indispensable.
In this perspective, this study aims to conduct an ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in the Vila São Bento neighborhood, Crato, Ceará, Brazil.
Materials and Methods
Study area
The municipality of Crato (7º 14' 03" S; 39º 24' 34" W) is in the south of the state of Ceará, Brazil, in the Cariri microregion at the foot of the Chapada do Araripe. With a population of 121,428 inhabitants (in 2010) with warm tropical semiarid climate[7], Vila São Bento neighborhood belongs to this local municipality of the study.
Ethnobotanical Survey
The research was carried out through semi-structured interviews based on standardized forms[8], and information about the interviewees´ knowledge was granted after reading, allowing and signing the Informed Consent Term, moreover, International Society of Ethnobiology's ethical guidelines[9] were adopted in an adapted manner. Twenty-five informants were interviewed, ranging from 30 to 75 years old from January to March 2015. Information was obtained on plants used for medicinal purposes, their uses, preparations, and parts used, using the free-listing technique[10].
The species were identified through photographic records, specialized literature, reference materials and consultation with botanical databases. Due to the unfavorable flowering and fruiting conditions of the aforementioned species and short research period (study derived from an extension project) it was not possible to make exsiccates.
Data analysis
The index of relative importance (RI) of each medicinal species cited by the interviewees was calculated for the versatility of the species: RI = NBS + NP, where NBS is the number of body systems found in a given species (NBSS) divided by the total number of body systems treated by the most versatile species (NBSVS); NP: number of properties by a specific species (NPS), divided by the total number of properties by the most versatile species (NPVS), where 2.00 was the maximum value obtained by a species[11].
Ethical and legal aspects
For your contemplation and analysis, research was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee (CEP), of the Regional University of Cariri (URCA) and received a favorable opinion from CEP, under No. 1367311.
Results and Discussion
Twenty-one medicinal species were selected for the treatment or cure of many diseases (most of which are exotic). There were 16 families, with emphasis on Lamiaceae and Rutaceae (TABLE 1). The most used species were: Mentha spicata L., Chenopodium ambrosioides L., Ruta graveolens L. and Rosmarinus officinalis L.
The leaves were the most used part of the plant (42.31%), followed by bark (30.76%), inner bark (7.69%), root, flower, and fruit (3.85% each). The most common forms of administration were infusion (54.55%), lambedor (24.24%), sauce (12.12%), pulp (6.06%), and juice (3.03%). The medicinal plants were used mostly for diseases involving flu, fever, headache, and inflammation in general.
| Scientific name /Family | Local names | Habits | Origin | Used part | Preparation | Indications | RI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACANTHACEAE Justicia pectoralis Jacq. |
Anador | Herbaceous | NA | S, AP | Infusion | Fever, pains | 1,02 |
| AMARANTHACEAE Chenopodium ambrosioides L. |
Mastruz | Herbaceous | E | AP | On the water, infusion | Flu, general inflammation, pains, worm | 1,51 |
| ANACARDIACEAE Myracrodruon urundeuva M. Allemão |
Aroeira | Arboreal | NA | BR | Decoction, syrup, on the water, infusion | Uterine inflammation, cough | 0,68 |
| Anacardium occidentale L. | Caju | Arboreal | NA | BS, BR | On the water | General inflammation | 0,34 |
| ASPARAGACEAE Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. |
Babosa | Herbaceous | C | AP | Juice | Cicatrization, hemorrhoid, pains | 1,02 |
| ASTERACEAE Helianthus annuus L. |
Girassol | Herbaceous | C | S | Infusion | Labyrinthitis, nausea, stroke | 0,68 |
| CLEOMACEAE Cleome spinosa Jacq. |
Mussambê | Shrubby | NA | R | Syrup | Tuberculosis, pneumonia, flu | 0,62 |
| EUPHORBIACEAE Jatropha L. sp. |
Pião-roxo | Shrubby | NA | FL, AP | Infusion, juice | Pain in the joints, fever | 0,68 |
| FABACEAE Anadenanthera colubrina (Vell.) Brenan |
Angico | Arboreal | NA | BR | Syrup, decoction | Cough, flu | 0,48 |
| Hymenaea courbaril L. | Jatobá | Arboreal | NA | BS, BR | Syrup, infusion | Cough, flu, pneumonia, cicatrization | 0,97 |
| LAMIACEAE Mentha spicata L. |
Hortelã | Herbaceous | NT | AP | Infusion | Headache, flu, fever, cramps, heart problems, throat inflammation, cough | 2 |
| Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng. | Malva-do-reino | Herbaceous | E | AP | Syrup | Cough, flu, throat inflammation, General inflammation | 0,97 |
| Rosmarinus officinalis L. | Alecrim | Shrubby | E | AP, BR | Cooking, infusion | Nasal congestion, flu, headache, fever, cough | 1,11 |
| LYTHRACEAE Punica granatum L. |
Romã | Shrubby | C | BR | Infusion, gargle, syrup | Sore throat, hoarseness, cough | 0,62 |
| MYRTACEAE Eucalyptus globulus Labill. |
Eucalipto | Arboreal | C | AP | Syrup | Flu, sinusitis, fever | 0,82 |
| POACEAE Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf. |
Capim-santo | Herbaceous | NT | AP | Infusion | Throat inflammation, soothing | 0,68 |
| RUBIACEAE Morinda citrifolia L. |
Noni | Arboreal | C | FR | Juice | Cancer, diabetes | 0,8 |
| RUTACEAE Citrus reticulata Blanco |
Tangerina | Arboreal | NT | BR | Infusion | Migraine | 0,34 |
| Ruta graveolens L. | Arruda | Herbaceous | E | AP, BR | Maceration, infusion | Earache, cicatrization, cramps | 1,17 |
| XIMENIACEAE Ximenia americana L. |
Ameixa | Shrubby | NA | BR | Infusion, syrup, on the water | Diabetes, healing | 0,68 |
| ZINGIBERACEAE Alpinia zerumbet (Pers.) B.L.Burtt & R.M.Sm |
Colônia | Herbaceous | C | AP | Infusion | Diabetes, hypertention | 0,68 |
| NOTE: AP (Aerial Parts); BR (Bark); BS (Bast); C (Cultivated species); E (Exotic species); FL (Flower); FR (Fruits); NA (Native species); NT (Naturalized species); R (Root); S (Seeds). Source: Survey Data (2020). |
|||||||
The research revealed 21 species of medicinal plants for the treatment of 31 health problems, where 08 were indicated for the treatment of flu, 06 for cough, 05 for fever and 02 for headache. The same plants are used to treat several pathologies, evidencing the versatility of the species.
The four species identified as the most versatile are exotic, as well as most of the medicinal flora of this ethnobotanical survey. The predominance of exotic species is probably due to the habit of growing them for their own use in backyards, for food and / or medicinal purposes[12].
The respiratory system had the highest diseases reported, corroborating with another study in the literature[13], which several species are indicated to treat diseases of the respiratory tract, probably because it is related to the conditions, socioeconomic precariousness and sanitary of the populations.
Studies carried out in the state of Maranhão[14] showed that the leaf was the most used part of the plant (63.3%) because its greater indication for the ease in its collection. Some authors claim[15] that in the leaves, there is a great concentration of active principles. Similar results can be observed in other ethnobotanical surveys[2,16-19].
However, these results are not similar to those of another study[20] in the state of Pernambuco, where the bark (35%) of the stem was the highest used, followed by the leaf (27%). Thus, the use of plant parts can be directly linked to the environment to which the research will be conducted.
The Caatinga biome, for example, has a warm climate and prolonged periods of drought, with deciduous vegetation - the plants lose their leaves during the dry season. In this way, the bark becomes more commonly used by local communities. In the Cerrado environments with the perennial vegetation, the uses of the leaves tend to be more frequent[14,21].
Regarding the ways of preparation, surveys aimed at the use of medicinal plants, refer to the infusion with a greater number of citations by the informants[2,22,14]. This is because the infusion is used to prepare the soft parts of the plant, such as leaf, flowers, and buds, containing volatile components and active ingredients, degraded by the action of water and heat[23].
Some researchers have already[24] studied medicinal species in a Quilombo in the state of Maranhão, where the most representative botanical families were Lamiaceae and Rutaceae, results that corroborate our study.
There were 04 species in this study presenting greater versatility and great relative importance (RI): Mentha spicata (2,00), Chenopodium ambrosioides (1,51), Ruta graveolens (1,17), and Rosmarinus officinalis (1,11). These are taken in backyards or in free markets and have biological activities proven in the literature.
Mentha spicata species (mint) has anti-inflammatory action[25], antioxidant[26], gastroprotective, anticonvulsant[27], that classify the species as a medicinal herb. Also, it has been observed that it brings benefits to the treatment of arterial hypertension and acts on lowering cholesterol levels[28].
Chenopodium ambrosioides (mastruz) has activity against worms[29]. Other studies reveal anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties[30] and antifungal and antioxidant activities[31].
Ruta graveolens (rue) has already shown anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities in pharmacological tests[32]. Other studies have shown antifertility, abortive actions[33-35], antimicrobial[36,37], anthelmintic[38] and antispasmodic[39].
Finally, scientific studies in Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary) have shown antimicrobial, antibacterial[40], antioxidant[41], anti-inflammatory[42], antitumor and chemopreventive[43] and according to research[44], its leaves have the capacity to decrease insulin production causing an increase in blood glucose.
Among the 04 most cited species of the study, two are present in the National List of Medicinal Plants of Interest to SUS – RENISUS[45]: Ruta graveolens L. and Chenopodium ambrosioides L. As well as Mentha spicata and Rosmarinus officinalis, these species are commonly found in studies of this kind[46-48].
Conclusion
Medicinal plants are commonly used for the treatment of several diseases, especially those related to the respiratory system. The information revealed many species in Vila São Bento that may contribute to future phytochemical and ethnopharmacobotanical studies aiming at the development of new drugs, as well as the preservation and rational use of these species.
It is expected that the data from this research will contribute to: (i) the cultural valorization and registration of ethnobotanical knowledge; (ii) integration of local practices with primary health care; (iii) understanding the pattern of local native / exotic medicinal flora; (iv) stimulating the development of ethnobotanical studies; (v) act as comparative parameters for other local, regional and national ethnopharmacobotanical studies.
Financing Source
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledgments Regional University of Cariri (URCA) and the interviewed residents of Vila São Bento (Crato, Ceará, Brazil).
Contributors
Study design: CNFL; JPS; JBN; CDCA; MRK.
Data curation: CNFL; JPS; JBN; CDCA.
Data collection: CNFL; JPS; JBN; CDCA.
Data analysis: STSM; PRB; CNFL; JPS; JBN; CDCA.
Writing - Original Draft: CNFL; JPS; JBN; CDCA.
Writing - Review and Editing: STSM; PRB; MRK
.
References
1. Gomes ECS, Barbosa J, Vilar FCR, Perez JO, Vilar RC, Freire JLO et al. Plantas da caatinga de uso terapêutico: levantamento etnobotânico. Eng Amb Pesq Tecnol. 2008; 5(2): 074-085. ISSN: 1809-0664. [http://ferramentas.unipinhal.edu.br/engenhariaambiental/viewarticle.php?id=130&loc&locale=en].
2. Machado STS, Sousa JP, Batista PR, Correia DB, Alencar CDC, Nascimento JB et al. Ethnobotany study of vegetable species with therapeutic purposes from a rural community in the municipality of Barbalha, Ceará, Brazil. Ethnoscientia. 2020; 5(1): 1-8. ISSN: 2448-1998. [https://doi.org/10.22276/ethnoscientia.v5i1.288].
3. Santos LMM. Ecologia de saberes: a experiência do diálogo entre conhecimento científico e conhecimento tradicional na comunidade quilombola da Rocinha. Tempus – Acta Saúde Colet. 2014; 8(2): 243-256. ISSN: 1982-8829. [https://doi.org/10.18569/tempus.v8i2.1522].
4. Albuquerque UP, Hanazaki N. As pesquisas etnodirigidas na descoberta de novos fármacos de interesse médico e farmacêutico: fragilidades e perspectivas. Rev Bras Farmacog. 2006; 16(Supl.): 678-689. ISSN: ISSN 0102-695X. [https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2006000500015].
5. Castelletti CHM, Silva JMC, Tabarelli M, Santos AMM. Quanto ainda resta da Caatinga? Uma estimativa preliminar. In: Leal IR, Tabarelli M, Silva JMC. (edit.). Ecologia e Conservação da Caatinga. Recife: Ed. Universitária da UFPE, 2003, p. 719-734.
6. Silva ACO, Albuquerque UP. Woody medicinal plants of the caatinga in the state of Pernambuco (Northeast Brazil). Acta Bot Bras. 2005; 19(1): 17-26. ISSN: 0102-3306. [https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062005000100003].
7. Instituto de Pesquisa e Estratégia Econômica do Ceará – IPECE. Perfil básico municipal – Crato. 2009, 17 p. Acesso em: 19 dez. 2020. Disponível em: URL: [https://www.ipece.ce.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2018/09/Crato_2009.pdf].
8. Martin GJ. Ethnobotany: A methods manual. 1ª edition. London, Ed. Chapman & Hall, 1995.
9. International Society of Ethnobiology – ISE. Código de Ética da ISE (com adições em 2008) [online]. 2006. Acesso em: 03 fev. 2020. Disponível em: URL: [http://www.ethnobiology.net/ethics.php].
10. Albuquerque UP, Lucena RFP (orgs). Métodos e técnicas na pesquisa etnobotânica. 1ª ed. Recife, livro rápido, NUPEEA; 2004. ISBN 85-89501-26-4.
11. Bennett BC, Prance GT. Introduced plants in the indigenous Pharmacopoeia of Northern South America. Econom Bot. 2000; 54(1): 90-102. ISSN: 0013-0001. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866603].
12. Santos ABN, Araújo MP, Sousa RS, Lemos JR. Plantas medicinais conhecidas na zona urbana de Cajueiro da Praia, Piauí, Nordeste do Brasil. Rev Bras Pl Medic. 2016; 18(2): 442-450. ISSN: 1516-0572. [https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-084X/15_149].
13. Almeida CFCBR, Amorim ELC, Albuquerque UP, Maia MBS. Medicinal plants popularly used in Xingó region – a semi-arid location in Northeastern Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomedic. 2006; 2(15): 1-7. ISSN: 1746-4269. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-15].
14. Penido AB, Morais SM, Ribeiro AB, Silva AZ. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Imperatriz, state of Maranhão, Northeastern Brazil. Acta Amazon. 2016; 46 (4): 345-354. ISSN: 1809-4392. [https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201600584].
15. Gonçalves MIA, Martins DTO. Plantas medicinais usadas pela população do município de Santo Antônio de Leverger, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Rev Bras Farmácia. 1998; 79(3/4): 56-61. ISSN: 0370-372X.
16. Jacoby C, Coltro EM, Sloma DC, Müller J, Dias LA, Luft M et al. Plantas medicinais utilizadas pela comunidade rural de Guamirim, Município de Irati, PR. Rev Ciênc Exatas Nat. 2002; 4(1): 79-89, 2002. ISSN: 2175-5620. [https://revistas.unicentro.br/index.php/RECEN/article/view/470].
17. Pereira ZV, Mussury RM, Almeida AB, Sangalli A. Medicinal plants used by Ponta Porã community, Mato Grosso do Sul state. Acta Scient Biol Sci. 2009; 31(3): 293-299. ISSN: 1807-863X. [https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v31i3.3206].
18. Merétika AHC, Peroni N, Hanazaki N. Local knowledge of medicinal plants in three artisanal fishing communities (Itapoá, Southern Brazil), according to gender, age, and urbanization. Acta Bot Bras. 2010; 24(2): 386-394. ISSN: 0102-3306. [https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062010000200009].
19. Lima RA, Magalhães SA, Santos MRA. Levantamento etnobotânico de plantas medicinais utilizadas na cidade de Vilhena, Rondônia. Rev Pesq Criação. 2011; 10(2): 165-179. ISSN: 1982-7857. [https://periodicos.unir.br/index.php/propesq/article/view/422].
20. Almeida CFCBR, Albuquerque UP. Uso e conservação de plantas e animais medicinais no Estado de Pernambuco (Nordeste do Brasil): um estudo de caso. Interciência. 2002; 27(6): 276-285. ISSN: 0378-1844. [https://search.proquest.com/openview/a0e8678067c4865ec0bea5549f2b2dca/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=21011].
21. Linhares JFP, Rodrigues MIA, Hortegal EV, Silva PSS. Ethnobotany of the main medicinal plants commercialized in fairs and markets of São Luis, Maranhão State, Brazil. Rev Pan-Amazôn Saúde. 2014; 5(3): 39-46. ISSN: 2176-6215. [https://doi.org/10.5123/S2176-62232014000300005].
22. Oliveira HB, Kffuri CW, Casali VWD. Ethnopharmacological study of medicinal plants used in Rosário da Limeira, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Bras Farmacog. 2010; 20(2): 256-260. ISSN: 0102-695X. [https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2010000200020].
23. Castellani DC. Plantas Medicinais. 1ª edição. Viçosa: Agromídia software. 1999.
24. Monteles R, Pinheiro CUB. Plantas medicinais em um quilombo maranhense: uma perspectiva etnobotânica. Rev Biol Ciênc Terra. 2007; 7(2): 38-48. ISSN: 1519-5228. [http://joaootavio.com.br/bioterra/workspace/uploads/artigos/etnobotanica-518178b5ca552.pdf].
25. Arumugam P, Priya NG, Subathra M, Ramesh A. Anti-inflammatory activity of four solvent fractions of ethanol extract of Mentha spicata L. investigated on acute and chronic inflammation induced rats. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008; 26(1): 92-95. ISSN: 1382-6689. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2008.02.008].
26. Choudhury RP, Kumar A, Garg AN. Analysis of Indian mint (Mentha spicata) for essential, trace and toxic elements and its antioxidant behaviour. J Pharmac Biomed Anal. 2006; 41(3): 825-832. ISSN: 0731-7085. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2006.01.048].
27. Zhang LL, Chen Y, Li ZJ, Li X, Fan G. Bioactive properties of the aromatic molecules of spearmint (Mentha spicata L.) essential oil: a review. Food Funct. 2022; 13 (6): 3110-3132. ISSN: 2042-650X. [https://doi.org/10.1039/d1fo04080d].
28. Barbalho SM, Machado FMVF, Guiger EL, Silva PH, Silva VS, Oshiiwa M et al. Espécies de Mentha podem auxiliar na redução de fatores de risco vascular em pacientes diabéticos. Saúde Pesq. 2011; 4(3): 387-392. ISSN: 2176-9206. [https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/saudpesq/article/view/1343].
29. Paixão A, Mancebo B, Sánchez LM, Walter A, Fontes-Pereira AMA, Soca M et al. Tamizaje fitoquímico de extractos metanólicos de Tephrosia vogelii Hook, Chenopodium ambrosoides, Cajanus cajan y Solanum nigrum L. de la provincia de Huambo, Angola. Rev Salud Anim. 2014; 36(3): 164-169. ISSN: 2224-4700. [http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0253-570X2014000300005].
30. Ibironke GF, Ajiboye KI. Studies on the anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties of Chenopodium ambrosioides leaf extract in rats. Inter J Pharmacol. 2007; 3(1) 111-115. ISSN: 1812-5700. [https://doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2007.111.115].
31. Kumar R, Mishra AK, Dubey NK, Tripathi YB. Evaluation of Chenopodium ambrosioides oil as a potential source of antifungal, anti-aflatoxigenic and antioxidant activity. International J Food Microbiol. 2007; 115(2): 159-164. ISSN: 2666-5174. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.017].
32. Atta AH, Alkofahi A. Anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of some Jordanian medicinal plant extracts. J Ethnopharmacol. 1998; 60(2): 117-124. ISSN: 0378-8741. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(97)00137-2].
33. Kong YC, Lau CP, Wat KH, Ng KH, But PP, Cheng KF, Waterman PG. Antifertility principle of Ruta graveolens. Pl Medic. 1989; 55(2): 176-178. ISSN: 0032-0943. [https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-961917].
34. Gutiérrez-Pajares JL, Zúñiga L, Pino J. Ruta graveolens aqueous extract retards mouse preimplantation embryo development. Reproductive Toxicology. 2003; 17(6): 667-672. ISSN: 0890-6238. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2003.07.002].
35. Freitas TG, Augusto PM, Montanari T. Effect of Ruta graveolens L. on pregnant mice. Contraception. 2005; 71(1): 74-77. ISSN: 0010-7824. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2004.07.014].
36. Wolters B, Eilert U. Antimicrobial substances in callus cultures of Ruta graveolens. Pl Med. 1981; 43(10): 166-174. ISSN: 0032-0943. [https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-971494].
37. Ivanova A, Mikhova B, Najdenski H, Tsvetkova I, Kostova I. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity of Ruta graveolens. Fitoterapia. 2005; 76(3-4): 344-347. ISSN: 0367-326X. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2005.02.008].
38. Sousa RG, Falcão HS, Barbosa Filho JM, Melo Diniz MFF, Batista LM. Atividade anti-helmíntica de plantas nativas do continente americano: uma revisão. Rev Bras Pl Medic. 2013; 15(2): 287-292. ISSN: 1516-0572. [https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-05722013000200018].
39. Minker E, Bartha C, Koltai M, Rozsa Z, Schendrei K, Reisch J. Pharmacological study of the antispasmodic principles isolated from Ruta graveolens L. [rue]. Pl Med. 1979. 36(3): 255-256. ISSN: 0032-0943. [https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XE794J383].
40. Moreno S, Galván EM, Vázquez NM, Fiorilli G, Guido PC. Antibacterial efficacy of Rosmarinus officinalis phytochemicals against nosocomial multidrug-resistant bacteria grown in planktonic culture and biofilm. In: MÉNDEZ-VILAS, A. (Ed.). The Battle Against Microbial Pathogens: Basic Science, Technological Advances and Educational Programs. 1st edition. Badajoz: Formatex, 2015, p. 3-8.
41. Rašković A, Milanović I, Pavlović N, Ćebović T, Vulkmirović S, Mikov M. Antioxidant activity of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) essential oil and its hepatoprotective potential. BMC Compl Alter Medic. 2014; 14(1): 1-9. ISSN: 2662-7671. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-225].
42. Minich DM, Bland JS, Katke J, Darland G, Hall A, Lerman RH et al. Clinical safety and efficacy of NG440: a novel combination of rho iso-alpha acids from hops, rosemary, and oleanolic acid for inflammatory conditions. Canadian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007; 85(9): 872-883. ISSN: 0008-4212. [https://doi.org/10.1139/Y07-055].
43. Pérez-Fons L, Aranda FJ, Guillén J, Villalaín J, Micol V. Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) diterpenes affect lipid polymorphism and fluidity in phospholipid membranes. Arch Biochem Bioph. 2006; 453(2): 224-236. ISSN: 0003-9861. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2006.07.004].
44. Al-Hader AA, Hasan ZA, Aqel MB. Hyperglycemic and insulin release inhibitory effects of Rosmarinus officinalis. J Ethnopharmacol. 1994; 43(3): 217-221. ISSN: 0378-8741. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(94)90046-9].
45. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. RENISUS - Relação Nacional de Plantas Medicinais de Interesse ao SUS. Espécies vegetais. DAF/SCTIE/MS - RENISUS - fev/2009. Disponível em: [https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/composicao/sectics/pnpmf/ppnpmf/arquivos/2014/renisus.pdf]. [acesso em: 18 jan. 2018].
46. Estrada E, Villarreal JA, Cantú C, Cabral I, Scott L, Yen C. Ethnobotany in the Cumbres de Monterrey National Park, Nuevo León, México. J Ethnobiol Ethnomedic. 2007; 3(1): 1-8. ISSN: 1746-4269. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-3-8].
47. Alonso-Castro AJ, Maldonado-Miranda JJ, Zarate-Martinez A, Jacobo-Salcedo MR, Fernández-Galicia C, Figueroa-Zuñiga LA et al. Medicinal plants used in the Huasteca Potosina, México. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012; 143(1): 292-298. ISSN: 0378-8741. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.06.035].
48. Santos RS, Mota LHS, Marques BC, Reis LB, Silva CF, Lima DAC et al. Uso regular de plantas medicinais para fins terapêuticos em famílias residentes na zona rural de Santo Antônio de Jesus – Bahia – Brasil. J Health Biol Sci. 2017; 5(4): 364-370. ISSN: 2317-3084. [https://doi.org/10.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v5i4.1317.p364-370.2017].