Artigo de Pesquisa
Effects cytotoxic and genotoxic of Psittacanthus acinarius and Psittacanthus cordatus (mistletoe) on Allium cepa
Abstract
This study assessed the cytotoxic and genotoxic potentials of extracts of Psittacanthus acinarius (Mart.) Mart. and Psittacanthus cordatus (Hoffmanns.) in the root cell cycle of Allium cepa L. Aqueous leaf extracts of P. acinarius and P. cordatus at three concentrations: 0.00, 5 and 20 mg/mL for 24 hours. Histological slides were prepared and mitotic indices (MI %) and chromosomal alteration indices (CAI %) were determined. Inhibitory effects of the aqueous extract of leaves of P. acinarius were observed in 46.33 and 46.00% at concentrations of 5 and 20 mg/mL, respectively, in relation to the control (62.83%), in addition to a higher chromosomal alteration index by 0.26% at a concentration of 20 mg/mL. In the aqueous extract of leaves of P. cordatus, the greatest inhibitory effects were 33.83 and 35.50% in the concentrations of 5 and 20 mg/mL, respectively, in relation to the control (88.16%) and the highest alteration index chromosomal (3.30%) at 5 mg/mL. The aqueous leaf extracts of P. acinarius and P. cordatus at concentration of 5 and 20 mg/mL inhibit MI %, reveal an irregular recovery or prevent it, and induce chromosomal alterations, suggesting cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on division of meristematic cells of A. cepa.
- Keywords:
- Chromosomal alteration.
- Medicinal mistletoe.
- Mitotic index.
- Bioassays.
Introduction
The family Loranthaceae Juss. (Santalales), with 70 genera and 940 species[1], has a great diversity of mistletoes distributed mainly in tropical areas, but also temperate regions[2]. Among the genera of this family, the Psittacanthus Mart. has approximately 120 species distributed from California (USA) to Argentina, extending through Jamaica and other Caribbean islands[3]. In Brazil, it is the most representative genus, being found in the Amazon, Atlantic Forest, Caatinga, Cerrado, and Pantanal[4]. Its flowers produce nectars enriched with biomolecules attractive to pollinators[5,6].
Besides presenting an ecological interaction, this genus has therapeutic potential, with description of plants used for diabetes and hypertension[7], with anti-inflammatory[8], antibacterial, and antioxidant activity[9], vasodilator[10] and anti-hyperglycemic effect, and genotoxicity[11].
The species Psittacanthus acinarius (Mart.) Mart. and Psittacanthus cordatus (Hoffmanns.) are among the plants of this genus. These species have been used popularly in the treatment of cancer[12]. Also, P. acinarius has medicinal uses for treating wounds, ulcers, and diabetes and disorders of the urinary, respiratory, cardiovascular, and reproductive systems[12], while P. cordatus is used to treat eye infections[13]. Despite the medicinal importance of these species, few studies have described the possible toxic compounds synthesized by plants, being required studies that reveal the possible damage to human health.
The cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of plant extracts can be assessed in several cytogenetic assays, such as in the root tips of plant species[14]. Among these assays is the Allium cepa L. test, which allows the contact of the root of the test organism with the tested substance, allowing assessing different doses of the studied plant, showing possible cytotoxic and mutagenic potential[15]. Inhibition in the cell cycle, interruption in metaphases, induction of numerical and structural chromosomal alterations, and sister chromatid exchanges are among the alterations observed cytologically[15]. In addition to assessing various genetic parameters, it also allows verifying the mechanism of action of the substances tested in the DNA and stating that the action of a compound is cytotoxic, genotoxic, or carcinogenic[16]. Therefore, it is an important tool for such assessments[17-19]. Thus, this study aimed to assess the cytotoxic and genotoxic potentials of concentrations of aqueous leaf extract of P. acinarius (EAFPa) and P. cordatus (EAFPc) in the cell cycle of A. cepa.
Material and Methods
Linking
This study is linked to the Mistletoes Project, under the responsibility of the Research Group Unemat/CNPq FLOBIO (Study of the Flora Bearing Bioactive Substances of Mato Grosso).
Plant material
Leaves of Psittacanthus cordatus (Hoffmanns.)and Psittacanthus acinarius (Mart.) Mart. were collected on plants of aroeira preta [Astronium urundeuva (M.Allemão) Engl., Anacardiaceae] and guava (Psidium guajava L., Myrtaceae), respectively, at the University Campus Jane Vanini of the Mato Grosso State University "Carlos Alberto Reyes Maldonado" (UNEMAT), in the municipality of Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil, located at 16°03′46.1″ N, 57°40′48.82″ W, with an altitude of 123 m. The identification was carried out in 2015 with the assistance of Dr. Claudenir Simões Caires from the State University of Southwest Bahia (UESB), who has experience in the botany area, with an emphasis on morphology and taxonomy of Loranthaceae and Viscaceae.
Preparation of extracts
The leaves (500 g of each species) were dehydrated in an air-circulation oven at 45°C for seven days and ground in a mill (IKA®, model M20). The extracts were prepared with 150 g of the crushed material and 750 mL of distilled water at ambient temperature for 60 minutes, being subsequently filtered on ordinary filter paper. This process was repeated three times. The extract was then taken to an air-circulation oven at 45°C for seven days until the water evaporated, obtaining the concentrated aqueous extract.
Model system
Onions (Allium cepa L.; 2n=16) obtained commercially were subjected to rooting in 50 mL of distilled water and maintained in a germination chamber of the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) type at 25°C and under constant white light for 72 hours. The roots reached an average length of 2 cm and were submitted to concentrations of aqueous extract for each species, that is, D1=5 mg/mL and D2=20 mg/mL, including the negative control (NC, D0=0 mg/mL), which remained exclusively in distilled water. The experimental unit consisted of six replications arranged in a completely randomized design. The average diameter values (mm) of onions within each species varied little (P. acinarius: NC or D0=51.66, D1=51.16, and D2=51.66; P. cordatus: NC or D0=39.00, D1=38.83, and D2=38.16). The pH values of all doses were determined with a portable Kasvi pH meter (model K39-0014PA) (TABLE 1). The roots (still in the onions) were subjected to diluted doses in 50 mL of distilled water for 24 hours, whose environment was qualified as treatment (Ti). After this period, 50% of the roots were collected and the remaining roots were subjected to distilled water without the concentrations for 24 hours to assess the recovery of the mitosis process, which was qualified as the recovery environment (Ri). The roots collected in the process of submission to treatments and the recovery process were fixed in Carnoy solution (95% ethanol + glacial acetic acid, 3:1 v/v), and stored in a refrigerator for further analysis.
Species | Solutions (S) with the used doses (Di) (mg/mL) | ||
D0=0 | SD1=5 | SD2=20 | |
pH | |||
P. acinarius | 7.2 | 5.2 | 5.0 |
P. cordatus | 7.2 | 6.5 | 6.1 |
Cytogenetic analysis
Root ends were washed in distilled water for four minutes, hydrolyzed in 5N HCL for five minutes, and washed again in distilled water for four minutes. The root ends were transferred to histological slides and sectioned with cutting blades. Subsequently, a drop of Giemsa dye (5%) was superimposed on the coverslip, the tissue was crushed, the excess dye was removed using a filter paper[20], and photographed under an optical microscope (400x magnification). A total of 3000 cells were identified in each treatment, and normal cells at different division stages and those showing alterations in the cell cycle were counted (FIGURES 1A-1H). Mitotic indices (MI %) were calculated with the number of normal cells at each phase of cell division, divided by the total number of cells counted, while the cell alteration index (CAI %) was obtained by dividing the total number of cells with alterations in the cell cycle by the total number of cells counted. Both indices were multiplied by 100.
The data were subjected to analysis of variance and the means compared by the Tukey (for treatments) and Student tests (for submission environment) at the 5% significance level, using the statistical program SISVAR® for analysis[21]. The compared means were considered different when the conclusive error was likely to occur in a proportion lower than 1/20 (P < 0.05). Equal and different letters were used between similar and different means, respectively.
Results and Discussion
Cytotoxicity effect
An inhibitory effect (P < 0.05) of the mitotic index (MI %) was found in roots of A. cepa for doses of aqueous leaf extracts of P. acinarius (EAFPa) and P. cordatus (EAFPc) in the exposure environments (Ti) and with irregular partial recovery in the recovery environment (Ri) (TABLE 2).
Species: P. acinarius | ||
Doses of EAFPa (mg/mL) | Environments | |
Submission (Ti) | Recovery (Ri) | |
MI % (MeanSD) | ||
D0 = 0 | 62.83 4.20 aB | 71.33 3.40 aA |
D1 = 5 | 46.33 3.21 bB | 59.00 2.80 bA |
D2 = 20 | 46.00 6.97 bA | 44.50 2.68 cA |
Species: P. cordatus | ||
Doses of EAFPc (mg/mL) | Environments | |
Submission (Ti) | Recovery (Ri) | |
MI % (MeanSD) | ||
D0 = 0 | 88.16 6.91 aA | 77.83 6.06 aB |
D1 = 5 | 33.83 5.60 bB | 60.83 1.57 bA |
D2 = 20 | 35.50 3.13 bB | 56.66 4.76 bA |
SD – standard deviation. Means followed by the same lowercase letter in the column and uppercase letter in the row do not differ from each other by the Tukey test (for treatments) and Student t-test (for submission environment) at the significance level of 5% probability. |
The mitotic indices (MI %) for the species P. acinarius in the treatment environment (Ti) (presence of the EAFPa extract) were similar and lower at the tested doses (MID1 = 46.33% and MID2 = 46.00%) compared to the control (MID0 = 62.83 %). Also, the MI % recovered less with an increase in doses (MID0R0 = 71.33, MID1R1 = 59.00 %, and MID2R2 = 44.50%) when submitted to the recovery process (Ri). The recovery of MI% at the highest dose (D2 = 20 mg/mL) ceased, characterizing an irreversible effect in the cell division process at the highest dose (MID2 = 46.00% and MID2R2 = 44.50%) and a partially reversible effect at the lowest concentrated dose (MID1 = 46.33 % and MID1R1 = 59.00%) (TABLE 2).
The mitotic indices (MI %) of the species P. cordatus showed a similar trend relative to P. acinarius, although with different values. The MI % values were similar in the treatment environment (Ti) (presence of the EAFPc extract) at the two tested doses (MID1 = 33.83% and MID2= 35.50%) compared to the control (MID0 = 88.16%). Moreover, the IM % recovered less with increasing doses (MID0R0 = 77.83 %, MID1R1 = 60.83%, and MID2R2 = 56.66%) when submitted to the recovery process (Ri). The recovery of MI % occurred partially at both doses. It evidences the reversible effect on the cell division process for both doses (MID1 = 33.83% and MID1R1 = 60.83%; MID2 = 35.50 % and MID2R2 = 56.66%) (TABLE 2).
Genotoxicity effect
The aqueous leaf extracts of P. acinarius and P. cordatus at the doses D1 (5 mg/mL) and D2 (20 mg/mL) under submission (Ti) and recovery (Ri) presented chromosomal alterations (TABLE 3). However, no chromosomal alterations were observed in the cell cycle of roots of A. cepa exposed only to distilled water, that is, the zero dose (D0) or control (NC) (TABLE 3).
Species: P. acinarius | |||
Chromosomal alterations | Submission environment (Ti) Doses (mg/mL of EAFPa) |
||
D0 = 0 | D1 = 5 | D2 = 20 | |
Count (number of cases) | |||
Metaphase with chromosomal adhesion | – | – | 3 |
Micronucleus | – | – | 3 |
Binucleated prophase | – | – | 2 |
Total | – | – | 8 |
Chromosomal alterations | Recovery environment (Ri) | ||
D0 = 0 | D1 = 5 | D2 = 20 | |
Count (number of cases) | |||
Anaphase with chromosomal disorganization | – | 15 | 8 |
Bud cell | – | 2 | 1 |
C-metaphase cell | – | 5 | – |
Metaphase with chromosomal adhesion | – | 1 | 1 |
Polyploid metaphase | – | 1 | 1 |
Micronucleus | – | 1 | 2 |
Chromosomal bridge | – | 6 | 1 |
Achromatic spindle breakage | – | 6 | – |
Chromosomal rupture | – | 2 | 2 |
Total | – | 39 | 16 |
Species: P. cordatus | |||
Chromosomal alterations (Discrimination) |
Submission environment (Ti) Doses (mg/mL of EAFPa) |
||
D0 = 0 | D1 = 5 | D2 = 20 | |
Count (number of cases) | |||
Anaphase with chromosomal disorganization | – | 64 | 10 |
Diagonal anaphase | – | 5 | – |
Bud cell | – | 1 | – |
C-metaphase cell | – | 15 | 1 |
Micronucleus | – | 1 | – |
Chromosomal bridge | – | 6 | – |
Binucleated prophase | – | – | 1 |
Achromatic spindle breakage | – | 6 | 4 |
Chromosomal rupture | – | 1 | – |
Total | – | 99 | 16 |
Chromosomal alterations (Discrimination) |
Recovery environment (Ri) | ||
D0 = 0 | D1 = 5 | D2 = 20 | |
Count (number of cases) | |||
Anaphase with chromosomal disorganization | – | 72 | 96 |
Diagonal anaphase | – | – | 2 |
Bud cell | – | 1 | – |
C-metaphase cell | – | 5 | 4 |
Metaphase with chromosomal adhesion | – | 6 | 3 |
Polyploid metaphase | – | – | 5 |
Micronucleus | – | – | 2 |
Chromosomal bridge | – | 32 | 40 |
Binucleated prophase | – | – | 1 |
Achromatic spindle breakage | – | 1 | 1 |
Chromosomal rupture | – | 1 | 1 |
Total | – | 118 | 155 |
No significant differentiated effect (P < 0.05) was observed under the extract of P. acinarius in the chromosomal alteration index (CAI %) during the cell division as a function of the tested doses (D0 = 0.00%, D1 = 0.00%, and D2 = 0.26%) in the environment with exposure (Ti) of roots of A. cepa. However, the CAI % in the recovery environment of D1R1 (1.30%) was higher than in D2R2 (0.53%) and D0R0 (0.00%). In turn, the CAI% with extracts of P. cordatus under the submission environment was higher at the dose D1 (3.30%) relative to the control (D0 = 0.00%) and the highest dose D2 (0.53%). However, the CAI% under recovery presented similar values between D1 (3.93%) and D2 (6.20%), but higher values than the control (D0 = 0.005), in which the CAI % was null or absent (TABLE 4).
Species: P. acinarius | ||
Doses of EAFPa (mg/mL) | Environments | |
Submission | Recovery | |
CAI % (MeanSD) | ||
D0 = 0 | 0.00 0.00 aA | 0.00 0.00 bA |
D1 = 5 | 0.00 0.00 aB | 1.30 0.80 aA |
D2 = 20 | 0.26 0.36 aA | 0.53 0.62 bA |
Species: P. cordatus | ||
Doses of EAFPa (mg/mL) | Environments | |
Submission | Recovery | |
(MeanSD) | ||
D0 = 0 | 0.00 0.00 bA | 0.00 0.00 bA |
D1 = 5 | 3.30 3.20 aA | 3.93 0.89 aA |
D2 = 20 | 0.53 0.53 bB | 6.20 1.36 aA |
SD – standard deviation. Means followed by the same lowercase letter in the column and uppercase letter in the row do not differ from each other by the Tukey test (for treatments) and Student t-test (for submission environment) at the significance level of 5% probability. |
The effects of the aqueous extracts of P. acinarius and P. cordatus at the tested doses suggest a cytotoxic action, which is evidenced by the inhibition of cell division in meristematic cells of A. cepa exposed to the treatments, having as reference the control results. Several studies in the literature have shown inhibitory effects on the cell cycle of A. cepa when submitted to the extracts of medicinal plants, such as aqueous, methanolic, and hexanic extracts of bark and inflorescences of Phoradendron mucronatum (DC.) Krug & Urb[19], phenolic compounds (rosmarinic acid)[22], the leaf extract of Parkinsonia aculeata L.[23], and the aqueous extract of Grewia lasiocarpa[24].
The reviewed literature showed no studies revealing the chemical constituents present in the studied plants. However, several chemical constituents of the secondary metabolism were found in plants of the genus Psittacanthus, which may be related to the inhibition of the cell cycle division. The presence of flavonoids, coumarins, and hydrolyzable tannins was observed in the phytochemical analysis of aqueous and hydro-alcoholic leaf extracts P. plagiophyllus Eichl.[25]. Also, found gallic acid, flavonoids, and non-protein amino acid in the soluble fraction of methanol from the aqueous extract of P. calyculatus (DC.) G. Don[26]. Identified tannins, flavonoids, and phenylpropanoids in the methanolic extract of P. calyculatus and the absence of anthraquinones, steroids, and alkaloids[11].
The mitotic index did not return to the level of the lowest dose (D1 = 5 mg/mL) and control (D0 = 0 mg/mL) in the process of recovering from the highest dose of the P. acinarius extract (EAFPa) (D2 = 20 mg/mL), showing an irreversible cytotoxic effect.
The alterations found in the tested doses suggest damage that plant extracts may cause to living organisms, including humans. Among the anomalies found, the most frequent for the two studied species were the anaphase with chromosomal disorganization (5.6%), chromosomal bridge (2.4%), C-metaphase cell (0.53%) (FIGURE 1E, 1F, 1G, 1H and TABLE 3). The effects caused in meristematic cells of roots of A. cepa are related to spindle inhibition, leading to chromosome displacement, viscosity, bridging in anaphase, and several other types of abnormalities as the dose of the tested plant extract increases[24].
Conclusion
The aqueous leaf extracts of P. acinarius and P. cordatus at doses of D1 = 5 and D2 = 20 mg/mL inhibit MI %, show irregular recovery or prevent it, and induce chromosomal alterations, suggesting cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on the division of meristematic cells of A. cepa..
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Mato Grosso State University "Carlos Alberto Reyes Maldonado" (UNEMAT), Cáceres University Campus Jane Vanini, and the research group Unemat/CNPq FLOBIO (Study of the Flora Bearing Bioactive Substances of Mato Grosso) and to its members for the institutional support provided; and to Dr. Claudenir Simões Caires of the State University of Southwest Bahia (UESB) for the botanical identification.
References
1. Nickrent DL. The Parasitic Plant Connection. 1997, onwards. Disponível em: [https://parasiticplants.siu.edu/Loranthaceae]. Accessed on: 06 April 2020.
2. Vidal‐Russell R, Nickrent DL. Evolutionary relationships in the showy mistletoe family (Loranthaceae). Am J Bot. 2008; 95(8): 1015-1029. [https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800085] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21632422/].
3. Caires CS. Flora of the canga of Serra dos Carajás, Pará, Brazil: Loranthaceae. Rodriguésia. 2018; 69(1): 133-146. [https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201869111].
4. Arruda R, Fadini RF, Carvalho LN, Del-Claro K, Mourão FA, Jacobi CM et al. Ecology of neotropical mistletoes: an importante canopy-dwelling component of Brazilian ecosystems. Acta Bot Brasilica. 2012; 26(2): 264-274. [https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062012000200003].
5. Guerra TJ, Galetto L, Silva WR. Nectar secretion dynamic links pollinator behavior to consequences for plant reproductive success in the ornithophilous mistletoe Psittacanthus robustus. Plant Biol. 2013; 16: 956-966. [https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12146] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24641568/].
6. Quintana-Rodríguez E, Ramírez-Rodríguez AG, Ramírez-Chávez E, Molina-Torres J, Camacho-Coronel X, Esparza-Claudio J et al. Biochemical traits in the flower lifetime of a Mexican mistletoe parasitizing mesquite biomass. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9: 1031. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01031] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30174673/].
7. Hernández T, García-Bores AM, Serrano R, Ávila G, Dávila P, Cervantes H et al. Phytochemistry and biological activities of important plants in traditional medicine in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley. Rev Esp Cienc Quím Biol. 2015; 18(2): 116-121. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recqb.2015.09.003].
8. Bezerra ANS, Massing LT, Oliveira RB, Mourão RHV. Standardization and anti-inflammatory activity of aqueous extract of Psittacanthus plagiophyllus Eichl. (Loranthaceae). J Ethnopharmacol. 2017; 202: 234-240. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.03.029] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28330723/].
9. Marín-Canchala DI, Brango-Vanegas J, Galeano-García P. Caracterización química, evaluación de la actividad antioxiodante y antibacterial del extracto crudo de Psittacanthus cucullaris. Momen Ciencia. 2013; 10(1): 2-10. [http://www.uniamazonia.edu.co/revistas/index.php/momentos-de-ciencia/article/view/245]. Accessed on: 18 july 2020.
10. Ibarra-Alvarado C, Rojas A, Mendoza S, Bah M, Gutiérrez DM, Hernández-Sandoval L et al. Vasoactive and antioxidant activities of plants used in Mexican traditional medicine for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Pharm Biol. 2010; 48(7): 732-739. [https://doi.org/10.3109/13880200903271280] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20645769/].
11. Avila-Acevedo JG, García-Bores AM, Martínez-Ramírez F, Hernández-Delgado CT, Ibarra-Barajas M, Romo VA et al. Antihyperglycemic effect and genotoxicity of Psittacanthus calyculatus extract in streptozotocininduced diabetic rats. Bol Latinoam Caribe Pl Med Aromat. 2012; 11(4): 345-353. [https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/856/85623048006.pdf]. Accessed on: 18 july 2020.
12. Rieder A, Silva OB, Rodrigues LC, Rodrigues FAC, Silva DAS. Medicinal use of mistletoes in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Phytomedicine. 2015; 22: S11. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2015.05.020].
13. Svetaz L, Zuljan F, Derita M, Petenatti E, Tamayo G, Cáceres A et al. Value of the ethnomedical information for the discovery of plants with antifungal properties. A survey among seven Latin American countries. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010; 127(1): 137-158. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2009.09.034] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19782744/].
14. Ribeiro LR, Santos MF, Silva QM, Palmieri MJ, Andrade-Vieira LF, Davide LC. Cytogenotoxic effects of ethanolic extracts of Annona crassiflora (Annonaceae). Biologia. 2013; 68(3): 433-438. [https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0185-3].
15. Bagatini MD, Silva ACFD, Tedesco SB. The use of Allium cepa test as a bioindicator of genotoxicity of medicinal plants infusions. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2007; 17(3): 444-447. [https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2007000300019].
16. Leme DM, Marin-Morales MA. Allium cepa test in environmental monitoring: a review on its application. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2009; 682(1): 71-81. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.06.002] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19577002/].
17. Pastori T, Kuhn AW, Tedesco M, Hoffmann CE, Neves LAS, Canto-Dorow TS et al. Genotoxic and antiproliferative action of Polygonum punctatum Elliott (Polygonaceae) on the cell cycle of Allium cepa L. Rev Bras Pl Med. 2015; 17(2): 186-194. [https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-084X/13_023].
18. Dornelles RC, Leal GC, Decian ACS, dos Santos DD, Radiske GA, Manfron MP et al. Tedesco SB. Antiproliferative and genotoxic potential from extracts and fractions of Richardia brasiliensis Gomes (Rubiaceae) by the Allium cepa L. test system. Iheringia. Série Botânica. 2017; 72(3): 424-431. [https://doi.org/10.21826/2446-8231201772313].
19. Rieder A, Rodrigues FAC, Silva OB, Santos MD, Lucatto M, Silva TM et al. Mitotic effects of barks and inflorescences extracts of mistletoe Phoradendron mucronatum (DC.) Krug & Urb. Phytomedicine. 2019; 61: 4-5. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2019.09.112].
20. Guerra M, Souza MJ. Como observar cromossomos: um guia de técnicas em citogenética vegetal, animal e humana. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Funpec; 2002.
21. Ferreira DF. Sisvar: A computer statistical analysis system. Ciênc Agrotec. 2011; 35(6): 1039-1042. [https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001].
22. Liman R, Ciğerci İH, Gökçe S. Cytogenetic and genotoxic effects of Rosmaniric Acid on Allium cepa L. root meristem cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2018; 121: 444-449. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.09.022] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30248483/].
23. Sharma S, Sharma S, Vig AP. Antigenotoxic potential of plant leaf extracts of Parkinsonia aculeata L. using Allium cepa assay. Pl Physiol Biochem. 2018; 130: 314-323.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.07.017] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30036860/].
24. Akwu NA, Naidoo Y, Singh M. Cytogenotoxic and biological evaluation of the aqueous extracts of Grewia lasiocarpa: An Allium cepa assay. S Afr J Bot. 2019; 125: 371-380. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2019.08.009].
25. Bezerra ANS, Oliveira RBD, Mourão RHV. Psittacanthus plagiophyllus Eichl. (Loranthaceae): Phytochemical profile, gastroprotective effect and acute toxicity. Rev Fitos. 2016; 10(2): 95-219. [https://doi.org/10.5935/2446-4775.20160011].
26. Moustapha B, Marina GA, Raúl FO, Raquel CM, Mahinda M. Chemical constituents of the Mexican mistletoe (Psittacanthus calyculatus). Molecules. 2011; 16(11): 9397-9403. [https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16119397] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22071447/].